Validators and Staking
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Basics of Staking
- Staking Principles
- Staking Rewards
- Previous Validator Registrations
- Staking Propositions
Introduction
We want to roll out and improve our validator and staking strategy.
Basics of Staking
Staking can happen on
- ThreeFold Guardian Validators
- ThreeFold Farms
Staking is important for the following reasons:
- You show your support for a farmer or a guardian, because you give them your vote of confidence.
- You show your support for the TFGrid by locking in value and receiving rewards for doing so.
Staking Principles
- 9 to 33 validators are operated by ThreeFold Guardians. We call them Guardian Validators.
- As block creators are elected based on staking, it is not possible to enforce a lower bound. These numbers (9 to 33) would need to be discussed and approved.
- Every TFT token holder can stake their tokens on Guardian Validator(s) or on the Farm(s) of their choice.
- The minimum number of TFT per validator is 2,000,000 TFT.
- The Guardians and Farmers get votes on the TFChain DAO in relation to the weight of the amount of staked tokens on their Validator or Farm.
- A form of punishment (e.g. slashing) should be implemented in the cases where the authority misbehaves. The incites validators to be constantly effective and will allow stakers to support trusted parties (e.g. validators with few or no failures)
- Potential slashing events:
- Failure to participate promptly in minting.
- Normal PoS slashing events.
- Potential slashing events:
Staking Rewards
The initial rewards for the staking tokens on a Guardian Validator are
- 10% of TFT that is used for utilization of the grid.
- A commission of 20% on above 10% goes to the Validator Operator = The Guardian.
The initial rewards for the staking tokens on a ThreeFold Farm are the following:
- 10% of TFT is used for utilization of the grid.
- A commission of 20% of the 10% (i.e. 2%) goes to the 3Nodes Operator, i.e. the Farmer. This is only for the tokens that are staked, the farmer gets other rewards in relation to utilization.
Previous Validator Registrations
- L0 and L2 validators will be able to delegate their TFTs to the new staking model
- 2 millions tft for L2
- 100 000 tft for L0
- delegated staking will be done at a later stage
Thus, we need to find the best staking program that would best suit the grid.
Staking Propositions
Staking Proposition: Validator Staking Only
Validator Part
We propose a simplified staking model for the TFGrid 3.50.
In this proposition, there would only be one kind of staking on the TFGrid: validator staking. In essence, node staking and farm staking would simply be delegated staking to the validator staking model. The 10% of staking revenue to validators and the 10% of staking revenue to farmers would thus be combined in one 20% and distriuted on the pro rata of the staking quantity.
We also propose that each 3Node on the grid would require a given amount of TFT collateral. This TFT collateral would be used as deletaged staking. In this scenario, farmers would have their collateral/staking TFTs delegated to validators.
Furthermore, the weigth of a given DAO vote would be based on the current shares in validator staking. Since every farmer would have TFT collateral directed as delegated validator staking, every farmer would have a weight on DAO voting.
Since validators get revenues from utilization on the TFGrid, this overall staking model would give a great emphasis and importance on utilization. It would incite members of the whole ecosystem to increase grid utilization.
Node Staking and TFT as Collateral
When it comes to node staking, we propose the following model with two node staking options: having TFT as collateral and liquid farming rewards, or having locked TFT (non-liquid) until you achive the collateral amount.
Each 3Node requires a minimum amount of collateral based on their 3Node resources.
If the farmer stakes the minimum TFT collateral amount for their 3Node, the TFT farming rewards are liquid and thus the amount of TFT they farm at everyone minting period is directly available to them.
If the farmer doesn't stake the minimum TFT collateral amount for their 3Node, the TFT farming rewards are non-liquid and thus the amount of TFT they farm at every minting period is locked until they stake the minimum collateral amount.
- Farming model with 2 options
- (1) A farmer stakes the minimum TFT for their given 3Node as collateral
- Monthly farming rewards become liquid (unlocked)
- (2) A farmer doesn't stake the minimum TFT for their given 3Node as collateral
- Monthly farming rewards are non-liquid (unlocked) and added to the validator staking pool
- When the total staked TFT reaches the minimum TFT for their given 3Node as collateral
- the additional TFT becomes liquid
- In short, it goes back to option (1).
- When the total staked TFT reaches the minimum TFT for their given 3Node as collateral
- Monthly farming rewards are non-liquid (unlocked) and added to the validator staking pool
- (1) A farmer stakes the minimum TFT for their given 3Node as collateral
As a concrete example, say a farmer has a 3Node with XYZ resources and this 3Node requires 10 000 TFT of collateral. The farmer can decide to stake 10 000 TFT as delegated staking to a validator. This 10 000 TFT acts as a collateral for their 3Node. This way, after each minting period, the farmer receives unlocked TFT rewards.
If the farmer doesn't have any TFT or simply doesn't want to stake the 10 000 TFT as collateral, the TFT farming rewards they receive at each minting period would directly go to a delegated staking of a validator. The 3Node would then farm TFT at every minting period and when the 10 000 TFT are staked, any TFT minted after this point would be liquid and unlocked to the farmer.
Staking Proposition: Node Staking
We propose to have a maximum TFT quantity to be used as staking.
For now, we have
- 50 validators at 100 000 TFT
- 50 validators at 2 millions TFT
- This gives a total of 105 millions TFT staked
If we set a limit to 125 millions TFT staked, we would need 20 millions TFT staked from farming and nodes.
Let us call farming unit (fru) the mininum of the ratio 8GB of RAM/1 vcore/100 GB of SSD.
This TFT staked goes to the validator staking pools. Farmers thus do delegated staking to validators and get in return part of the rewards and voting weight.
We show a simple example with 20 millions TFT and a typical server of 32 vcores, 256 GB of RAM and 4 TB of SSD.
Whole Network | Quantities | Typical Server (TS) | Quantities |
---|---|---|---|
Total TFT to stake (sTFT) | 20000000 | cru | 32 |
total cru | 62419 | mru | 256 |
total mru | 402100 | sru | 4000 |
total sru | 9445009 | CU=min(cru,mru,sru) | 63.75 |
total fru (tfru) = min(cru,mru/8,sru/100) | 50262.5 | fru = CU/2 | 31.88 |
Staking TFT per fru (sTFT/tfru) | 397.91 |
With the above example, the TFT to stake as collateral for the proposed typical server would be around 13 000 TFT. The ROI would be around 7 months:
TS Parameters | Quantities |
---|---|
TS TFT farmed/month | 1912.5 |
TS TFT to stake | 12683.41 |
ROI with staking (months) | 6.63 |
In this example, each farming unit (fru) would need around 398 TFT staked. If a farmer doesn't want to put staking as collateral, the TFT farmed is locked until it achieves the minimum staking as collateral amount.
Staking Proposition: Farm and Validator Altogether
We are open to suggestions when it comes to implementing farm staking alongside with validator staking.